
GRID M60-0B vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

GRID M60-0B
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M60-0B is positioned at rank #417 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-0B
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0B.
| Insight | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $19,900), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 13231.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13231.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($19,900) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-0B and GeForce GTX 560 SE

GRID M60-0B
The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0B scores 1,838 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0B) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,838 | 1,847 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+611% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+469% | 0.8479 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-0B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0B draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0B) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2 | 12.3+50% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-0B launched at $19900 MSRP and currently averages $19900, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 560 SE costs 99.2% less ($19750 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 12200% better value. The GRID M60-0B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $19900 | $150-99% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $19900 | $150-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 12.3+12200% |
| Codename | GM204 | GF114 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #706 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















