GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

GRID M60-0B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0B

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 13255.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $19,900 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($19,900 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $19,751 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
  • Delivers 13495.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,871 vs 1,838), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M60-0B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19,751 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $19,900, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13495.5% (12.6 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-0B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0B

The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0B scores 1,838 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0B) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-0BRadeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score
1,838
1,871+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+287%
1.248 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1219 MHz+3%
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
768 KB+500%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-0BRadeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0B and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-0BRadeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0B draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0B) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M60-0BRadeon Pro WX 2100
TDP
225W
35W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
8.2
53.5+552%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0B came in at $19900, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 99.3% cheaper ($19751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 12500% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 2100 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M60-0BRadeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP
$19900
$149-99%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
12.6+12500%
Codename
GM204
Lexa
Release
August 30 2015
June 4 2017
Ranking
#433
#702

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.