
GRID M60-0B

Radeon Pro WX 2100
GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-0B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌13255.7% HIGHER MSRP$19,900 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($19,900 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19,751 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13495.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-0B vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-0B
The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0B scores 1,838 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0B) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,838 | 1,871+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+287% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1219 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-0B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0B and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0B draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0B) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2 | 53.5+552% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-0B came in at $19900, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 99.3% cheaper ($19751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 12500% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 2100 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-0B | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $19900 | $149-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 12.6+12500% |
| Codename | GM204 | Lexa |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #433 | #702 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















