GeForce MX130
VS
GRID M60-0B

GeForce MX130 vs GRID M60-0B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

2017Core: 1122 MHzBoost: 1242 MHz
VS

GRID M60-0B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX130 is positioned at rank 301 and the GRID M60-0B is on rank 417, so the GeForce MX130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
100%
#291
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
722%
#293
654%
#294
653%
#298
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
593%
#299
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
589%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
100%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
100%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
98%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-0B

#402
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
164144%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
100%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
89%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
89%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
78%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
67%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
67%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
56%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
44%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
22%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
11%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX130.

InsightGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $19,900), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 38985.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+38985.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($19,900)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX130 and GRID M60-0B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0B

The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
G3D Mark Score
1,805
1,838+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9539 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+406%
Boost Clock
1242 MHz+5%
1178 MHz
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
192 KB
768 KB+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX130) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
TDP
30W-87%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
60.2+634%
8.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX130 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID M60-0B launched at $19900 and now averages $19900. The GeForce MX130 costs 99.7% less ($19850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (GeForce MX130) vs 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) — the GeForce MX130 offers 36000% better value. The GeForce MX130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX130GRID M60-0B
MSRP
$120-99%
$19900
Avg Price (30d)
$50-100%
$19900
Performance per Dollar
36.1+36000%
0.1
Codename
GM108
GM204
Release
November 17 2017
August 30 2015
Ranking
#713
#433