
GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M360

GeForce MX130
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX130 is positioned at rank 301 and the Radeon R9 M360 is on rank 443, so the GeForce MX130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX130.
| Insight | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $81), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 60.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+60.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX130 and Radeon R9 M360

GeForce MX130
The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,805 | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9539 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz+34% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX130) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 40 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 60.2+148% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX130 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 and now averages $81. The GeForce MX130 costs 38.3% less ($31 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (GeForce MX130) vs 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce MX130 offers 60.4% better value. The GeForce MX130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX130 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120-60% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $81 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1+60% | 22.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tropo |
| Release | November 17 2017 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #713 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















