GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

✅51.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M360

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$120 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M360 instead at 1,819 vs 1,805, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX130 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $180 cheaper on MSRP at $120 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 148.1% (15.0 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX130 vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Radeon R9 M360
G3D Mark Score	1,805	1,819
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9539 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1242 MHz+34%	925 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Radeon R9 M360
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX130 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX130) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Radeon R9 M360
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	40 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Radeon R9 M360
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	60.2+148%	24.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX130 came in at $120, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce MX130 was 60% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX130) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce MX130 offers 145.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX130 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce MX130	Radeon R9 M360
MSRP	$120-60%	$300
Performance per Dollar	15.0+146%	6.1
Codename	GM108	Tropo
Release	November 17 2017	May 5 2015
Ranking	#713	#711

Search GeForce MX130 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.