
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce MX130

GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:

GeForce MX130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX130.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 193.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+193.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 SE and GeForce MX130

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce MX130
The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the GeForce MX130 reaches 1,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,847+2% | 1,805 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 384+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 0.9539 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+100% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX130 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 40 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 60.2+389% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce MX130 launched at $120 and now averages $50. The GeForce MX130 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 36.1 (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 offers 193.5% better value. The GeForce MX130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $120-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 36.1+193% |
| Codename | GF114 | GM108 |
| Release | February 20 2012 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #706 | #713 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












