
GeForce GTX 560 SE

GeForce MX230
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce MX230 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce MX230 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce MX230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560 SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 150W vs 10W.
GeForce MX230
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 560 SE is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 150W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs GeForce MX230 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce MX230
The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the GeForce MX230 reaches 1,826 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce MX230 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 256 (GeForce MX230). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,847+1% | 1,826 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 288+13% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS+5% | 0.81 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+200% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+300% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX230 carries 2 GB. GeForce MX230 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE and 64-bit on the GeForce MX230. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 KB (GeForce MX230) — the GeForce MX230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce MX230's 10W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 350W (GeForce MX230). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 10W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 182.6+1385% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 SE came in at $150, while the GeForce MX230 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12.2 (GeForce MX230) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 0.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | GeForce MX230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 12.2 |
| Codename | GF114 | GP108 |
| Release | February 20 2012 | February 21 2019 |
| Ranking | #706 | #708 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















