
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Radeon R9 M360

GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M360.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $81 (vs $150), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 82.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+82.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($81) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 SE and Radeon R9 M360

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,847+2% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 512+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS+12% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 3.1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 210mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 24.3+98% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 and now averages $81. The Radeon R9 M360 costs 46% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) — the Radeon R9 M360 offers 82.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $81-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 22.5+83% |
| Codename | GF114 | Tropo |
| Release | February 20 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #706 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















