FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro 3D V7800
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌406% HIGHER MSRP$759 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌82.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 150W.
- ❌21% longer card at 254mm vs 210mm.
GeForce GTX 560 SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $609 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 400.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 274W, a 124W reduction.
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 254mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.
GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,867+1% | 1,847 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+611% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+311% | 0.8479 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V7800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V7800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE carries 1 GB. FirePro 3D V7800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7800 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 SE. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12_0+9% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.8 | 12.3+81% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro 3D V7800 came in at $759, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 SE was 80.2% cheaper ($609 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 392% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V7800 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V7800 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $759 | $150-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 12.3+392% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF114 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #423 | #706 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V7800 and GeForce GTX 560 SE
