
GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 SE.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $150), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 237.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+237.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 SE and Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 SE scores 1,847 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,847 | 1,871+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 512+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 1.248 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 SE comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 SE draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 210mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.3 | 53.5+335% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $45. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) vs 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 238.2% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 SE | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $45-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.3 | 41.6+238% |
| Codename | GF114 | Lexa |
| Release | February 20 2012 | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #706 | #702 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















