GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce MX130

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce MX130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce MX130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅54.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (1,855 vs 1,805), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX130 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce MX130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the GeForce MX130 reaches 1,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce MX130
G3D Mark Score	1,855+3%	1,805
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	0.9539 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce MX130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX130 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 675M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 40 GB/s (GeForce MX130) — a 140% advantage for the GeForce GTX 675M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the GeForce MX130. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce MX130
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s+140%	40 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce MX130
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	82°C	—
Perf/Watt	18.6	60.2+224%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce MX130 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GeForce MX130
MSRP	—	$120
Codename	GF114	GM108
Release	March 22 2012	November 17 2017
Ranking	#704	#713

Search GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Search GeForce MX130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.