GeForce GTX 675M vs Intel UHD Graphics P630

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 675M

2012Core: 620 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics P630

2018Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 675M

100

1,855

+0.4%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Intel UHD Graphics P630

1,848

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 129 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 is on rank 263, so the GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630

#253

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

587%

#255

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

533%

#256

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

531%

#260

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

483%

#261

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

480%

#263

Intel UHD Graphics P630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#264

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

99%

#265

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#270

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

94%

#271

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

93%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

92%

#275

GeForce GTS 160M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

92%

#276

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

92%

#277

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G

MSRP: $99|Avg: $70

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 675M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P630.

Insight	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics P630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M and Intel UHD Graphics P630

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score	1,855	1,848
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS+107%	0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	64+167%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 675M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	Quick Sync (Coffee Lake)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	Gen 9.5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 80°C.