GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 675M

2012

Why buy it

✅106.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 675M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 675M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 106.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 2100 instead at 1,871 vs 1,855, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 675M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 675M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score	1,855	1,871
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	1.248 TFLOPS+31%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder	No NVENC (Fermi)	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	82°C	80°C-2%
Perf/Watt	18.6	53.5+188%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 2100 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	GF114	Lexa
Release	March 22 2012	June 4 2017
Ranking	#704	#702

Search GeForce GTX 675M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 2100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.