GeForce GTX 675M vs GRID M60-0B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 675M is positioned at rank 129 and the GRID M60-0B is on rank 417, so the GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-0B

#402

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

164144%

#417

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

100%

#418

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

89%

#419

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

89%

#420

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

78%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

67%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

67%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

56%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

44%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

22%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

11%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0B.

Insight	GeForce GTX 675M	GRID M60-0B
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

GRID M60-0B Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 675M and GRID M60-0B

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

GRID M60-0B

The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 675M scores 1,855 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 675M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B).

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GRID M60-0B
G3D Mark Score	1,855	1,838
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9523 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+407%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GRID M60-0B
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 675M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-0B has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 675M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 675M	GRID M60-0B
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 675M draws 100W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 675M) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.