
FirePro M5100

GeForce GTX 675M
FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 675M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 675M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 675M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M5100
2013Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 675M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M5100 vs GeForce GTX 675M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.

GeForce GTX 675M
The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M5100 scores 1,874 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M5100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M5100) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,874+1% | 1,855 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS+4% | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 512 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 675M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M5100 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 675M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M5100) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (FirePro M5100) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M5100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M5100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Height | 70mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 18.6+49% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro M5100 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M5100 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Venus | GF114 |
| Release | October 16 2013 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #701 | #704 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














