GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

2017Core: 1122 MHzBoost: 1242 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX130 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX130 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,805 vs 1,789), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2017 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score
1,805
1,789
Architecture
Maxwell
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9539 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock
1242 MHz+24%
1000 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX130 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 carries 0 MB. GeForce MX130 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX130 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
40 GB/s
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
60.2
119.3+98%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX130 came in at $120, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 950 was 100+% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX130) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGeForce MX130Iris Plus Graphics 950
MSRP
$120
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
15.0
Infinity
Codename
GM108
Ice Lake GT2
Release
November 17 2017
sem dados
Ranking
#713
#634

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.