GeForce MX130 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce MX130

30

1,805

+0.9%

Iris Plus Graphics 950

15

1,789

0.0%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Iris Graphics 6100

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX130 is positioned at rank #301 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

100%

#291

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

722%

#293

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

654%

#294

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

653%

#298

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

593%

#299

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

589%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

100%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

100%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

98%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

95%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The GeForce MX130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

Insight	GeForce MX130	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX130 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX130 Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX130 and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score	1,805	1,789
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9539 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1242 MHz+24%	1000 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	32+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX130	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX130 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce MX130 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	40 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce MX130	Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP	30W	15W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	60.2	119.3+98%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX130 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (GeForce MX130) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.