GeForce MX230 vs GRID M60-0B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

2019Core: 1519 MHzBoost: 1582 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID M60-0B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce MX230 vs GRID M60-0B Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX230 vs GRID M60-0B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $19,750 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
  • Delivers 13080.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $19,900 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GRID M60-0B is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 225W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID M60-0B

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 13166.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $19,900 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($19,900 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 2150% higher power demand at 225W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-0B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,838 vs 1,826), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19,750 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $19,900, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13080.1% (12.2 vs 0.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-0B still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX230 vs GRID M60-0B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0B

The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
G3D Mark Score
1,826
1,838
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
2048+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.81 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+496%
Boost Clock
1582 MHz+34%
1178 MHz
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
16
128+700%
L1 Cache
96 KB
768 KB+700%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-0B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX230 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-0B carries 512 MB. GeForce MX230 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX230 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-0B. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX230) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
TDP
10W-96%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
182.6+2127%
8.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX230 came in at $150, while the GRID M60-0B launched at $19900. On MSRP, GeForce MX230 was 99.2% cheaper ($19750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) — the GeForce MX230 offers 12100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
MSRP
$150-99%
$19900
Performance per Dollar
12.2+12100%
0.1
Codename
GP108
GM204
Release
February 21 2019
August 30 2015
Ranking
#708
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.