GeForce MX230
VS
GRID M60-0B

GeForce MX230 vs GRID M60-0B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

2019Core: 1519 MHzBoost: 1582 MHz
VS

GRID M60-0B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX230 is positioned at rank 338 and the GRID M60-0B is on rank 417, so the GeForce MX230 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX230

#328
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
892%
#330
809%
#331
807%
#335
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
733%
#336
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
728%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
#351
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-0B

#402
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
164144%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
100%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
89%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
89%
#420
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
78%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
67%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
67%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
56%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
44%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
22%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
11%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX230 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce MX230 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-0B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX230 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $19,900 for the GRID M60-0B, it costs 99% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 13080.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+13080.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($19,900)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX230 and GRID M60-0B

NVIDIA

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0B

The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
G3D Mark Score
1,826
1,838
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
2048+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.81 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+496%
Boost Clock
1582 MHz+34%
1178 MHz
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
16
128+700%
L1 Cache
96 KB
768 KB+700%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX230 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-0B has 512 MB. The GeForce MX230 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX230) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W — a 183% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
TDP
10W-96%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
182.6+2127%
8.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX230 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID M60-0B launched at $19900 and now averages $19900. The GeForce MX230 costs 99.2% less ($19750 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) — the GeForce MX230 offers 12100% better value. The GeForce MX230 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX230GRID M60-0B
MSRP
$150-99%
$19900
Avg Price (30d)
$150-99%
$19900
Performance per Dollar
12.2+12100%
0.1
Codename
GP108
GM204
Release
February 21 2019
August 30 2015
Ranking
#708
#433