GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

✅19.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Radeon Pro WX 2100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
0.7% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$149 MSRP

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 2100 instead at 1,871 vs 1,826, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.2% (12.6 vs 12.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce MX230 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score	1,826	1,871+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.81 TFLOPS	1.248 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock	1582 MHz+30%	1219 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	32+100%
L1 Cache	96 KB	128 KB+33%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX230 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX230) vs 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce MX230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP	10W-71%	35W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	182.6+241%	53.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX230 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 0.7% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 3.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP	$150	$149
Performance per Dollar	12.2	12.6+3%
Codename	GP108	Lexa
Release	February 21 2019	June 4 2017
Ranking	#708	#702

Search GeForce MX230 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 2100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.