FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce MX230

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce MX230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce MX230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V7800

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
406% HIGHER MSRP
$759 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($759 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌2640% higher power demand at 274W vs 10W.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $609 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
✅Delivers 394.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $759 MSRP).
✅FirePro 3D V7800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 274W, a 264W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro 3D V7800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,867 vs 1,826), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $609 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $759, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 394.9% (12.2 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro 3D V7800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro 3D V7800 vs GeForce MX230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro 3D V7800

The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V7800 scores 1,867 and the GeForce MX230 reaches 1,826 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX230 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 256 (GeForce MX230). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230).

Feature	FirePro 3D V7800	GeForce MX230
G3D Mark Score	1,867+2%	1,826
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+700%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+330%	0.81 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+700%	16
L1 Cache	512 KB+433%	96 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro 3D V7800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7800	GeForce MX230
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V7800 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX230. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 512 KB (GeForce MX230) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7800	GeForce MX230
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V7800 draws 274W versus the GeForce MX230's 10W — a 185.9% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 350W (GeForce MX230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	FirePro 3D V7800	GeForce MX230
TDP	274W	10W-96%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.8	182.6+2585%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V7800 came in at $759, while the GeForce MX230 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce MX230 was 80.2% cheaper ($609 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V7800) vs 12.2 (GeForce MX230) — the GeForce MX230 offers 388% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	FirePro 3D V7800	GeForce MX230
MSRP	$759	$150-80%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	12.2+388%
Codename	Tahiti	GP108
Release	January 18 2014	February 21 2019
Ranking	#423	#708

Search FirePro 3D V7800 on Amazon

Search GeForce MX230 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.