GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Vega 11

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX230

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX230 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 11 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

✅11.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Vega 11 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (1,861 vs 1,826), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX230 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Vega 11 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.9% (12.4 vs 12.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon Vega 11 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce MX230 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX230

The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

Radeon Vega 11

The Radeon Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,861 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the Radeon Vega 11 reaches 1,861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 704 (Radeon Vega 11). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 11). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Vega 11
G3D Mark Score	1,826	1,861+2%
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	256	704+175%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.81 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+117%
Boost Clock	1582 MHz+26%	1251 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	16	44+175%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX230 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 11 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Vega 11
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX230 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 11 carries 0 MB. GeForce MX230 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX230 and System on the Radeon Vega 11.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Vega 11
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	48 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the Radeon Vega 11's 35W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 11). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Vega 11
TDP	10W-71%	35W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Perf/Watt	182.6+243%	53.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX230 came in at $150, while the Radeon Vega 11 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 12.4 (Radeon Vega 11) — the Radeon Vega 11 offers 1.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX230 (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce MX230	Radeon Vega 11
MSRP	$150	$150
Performance per Dollar	12.2	12.4+2%
Codename	GP108	Raven
Release	February 21 2019	May 10 2018
Ranking	#708	#673

Search GeForce MX230 on Amazon

Search Radeon Vega 11 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.