GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R9 M280X

GRID M60-0Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-0Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (827 vs 814), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M60-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M280X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M280X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score
827+2%
814
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+18%
4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+18%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-0Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R9 M280X
TDP
225W
200W-11%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
3.7
4.1+11%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, GRID M60-0Q was 100+% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-0Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID M60-0QRadeon R9 M280X
MSRP
$0-100%
$250
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
3.3
Codename
GM204
Tahiti
Release
August 30 2015
October 8 2013
Ranking
#433
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.