
GRID RTX6000-2Q vs GeForce GT 735M

GRID RTX6000-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 735M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID RTX6000-2Q is positioned at rank 414 and the GeForce GT 735M is on rank 231, so the GeForce GT 735M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 735M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 735M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID RTX6000-2Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-2Q and GeForce GT 735M

GRID RTX6000-2Q
The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

GeForce GT 735M
The GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-2Q scores 656 and the GeForce GT 735M reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GT 735M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 384 (GeForce GT 735M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 735M).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 656 | 655 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+541% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+2300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-2Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 735M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 735M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 735M) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 735M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GT 735M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 350W (GeForce GT 735M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 13.1+352% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | GeForce GT 735M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GK107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















