
GRID RTX6000-2Q

Quadro FX 4700 X2
GRID RTX6000-2Q vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID RTX6000-2Q vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID RTX6000-2Q vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID RTX6000-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌110.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$2,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quadro FX 4700 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,301 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 116.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID RTX6000-2Q vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID RTX6000-2Q
The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-2Q scores 656 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 656 | 676+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+967% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+944% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GRID RTX6000-2Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-2Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-2Q and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 4.5+55% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID RTX6000-2Q came in at $6300, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, Quadro FX 4700 X2 was 52.4% cheaper ($3301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GRID RTX6000-2Q (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-2Q | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $2999-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
| Codename | GM204 | GT200B |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #433 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














