FirePro M7740 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M7740 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M7740 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M7740

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,800 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1177.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 225W, a 192W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID RTX6000-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1160% HIGHER MSRP
$6,300 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌581.8% higher power demand at 225W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M7740 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (665 vs 656), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M7740 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M7740 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,800 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $6,300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1177.3% (1.3 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro M7740 vs GRID RTX6000-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M7740

The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

GRID RTX6000-2Q

The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the GRID RTX6000-2Q reaches 656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID RTX6000-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q).

Feature	FirePro M7740	GRID RTX6000-2Q
G3D Mark Score	665+1%	656
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+598%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-2Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M7740 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro M7740	GRID RTX6000-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M7740 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q carries 512 MB. FirePro M7740 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M7740 and 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M7740) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M7740	GRID RTX6000-2Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the GRID RTX6000-2Q's 225W — a 148.8% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro M7740	GRID RTX6000-2Q
TDP	33W-85%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	20.2+597%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M7740 came in at $500, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q launched at $6300. On MSRP, FirePro M7740 was 92.1% cheaper ($5800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro M7740) vs 0.1 (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the FirePro M7740 offers 1200% better value. The newer card here is GRID RTX6000-2Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro M7740	GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP	$500-92%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	1.3+1200%	0.1
Codename	Chelsea	GM204
Release	June 27 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#752	#433

Search FirePro M7740 on Amazon

Search GRID RTX6000-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.