GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID RTX6000-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID RTX6000-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID RTX6000-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 160M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).

GRID RTX6000-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTS 160M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (679 vs 656), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 160M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID RTX6000-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID RTX6000-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 160M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID RTX6000-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 160M

The GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 679 points.

GRID RTX6000-2Q

The GRID RTX6000-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 656 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 160M scores 679 and the GRID RTX6000-2Q reaches 656 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 160M is built on Kepler while the GRID RTX6000-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	GRID RTX6000-2Q
G3D Mark Score	679+4%	656
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+561%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1178 MHz+24%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	768 KB+2300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	GRID RTX6000-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 160M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-2Q carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 160M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 160M and 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-2Q) — the GRID RTX6000-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	GRID RTX6000-2Q
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 160M draws 45W versus the GRID RTX6000-2Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 160M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-2Q). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	GRID RTX6000-2Q
TDP	45W-80%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.1+421%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID RTX6000-2Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP	—	$6300
Codename	GK107	GM204
Release	March 22 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#828	#433

Search GeForce GTS 160M on Amazon

Search GRID RTX6000-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.