GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 160M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-7480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

✅116.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 116.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 679), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTS 160M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 160M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 160M

The GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 679 points.

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 160M scores 679 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 reaches 697 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 160M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score	679	697+3%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	5.834 TFLOPS+700%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1266 MHz+33%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	144+350%
L1 Cache	32 KB	576 KB+1700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 160M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 160M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 160M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 160M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 160M draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTS 160M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R5 A6-7480
TDP	45W-70%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.1+228%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 A6-7480 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP	—	$35
Codename	GK107	Ellesmere
Release	March 22 2012	June 29 2016
Ranking	#828	#305

Search GeForce GTS 160M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A6-7480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.