GeForce GTS 160M
VS
Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

2009Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 160M is positioned at rank 275 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is on rank 88, so the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 160M

#265
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
639%
#267
580%
#268
578%
#272
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
526%
#273
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
522%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
99%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
98%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#287
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
96%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
415%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
399%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
394%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
393%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
393%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
390%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
385%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
384%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
380%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
379%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
375%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
374%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
367%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
367%
#73
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
458%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
83%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
82%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
79%
#88
Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
92%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
89%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
84%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
82%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
79%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
79%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
77%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
77%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 160M.

InsightGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

The GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 679 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 699 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 160M scores 679 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M reaches 699 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 160M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
G3D Mark Score
679
699+3%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+86%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 160M draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M's 108W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 160M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
TDP
45W-58%
108W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
15.1+132%
6.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTS 160M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MRadeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
GK107
Juniper
Release
March 22 2012
October 13 2009
Ranking
#828
#730