GeForce GTS 160M vs NVS 510

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 160M vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 160M vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 160M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 68W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.1% higher power demand at 68W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
NVS 510 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (680 vs 679), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 160M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
NVS 510 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, NVS 510 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 160M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 160M vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

The GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 679 points.

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 160M scores 679 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 160M is built on Kepler while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
G3D Mark Score
679
680
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512 ×2+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.058 TFLOPS ×2+45%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1033 MHz+9%
ROPs
16
16 ×2
TMUs
32
32 ×2
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 160M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 510 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 160M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 carries 2 GB. NVS 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 160M and 64-bit on the NVS 510. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 1 MB (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)+8%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 160M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 160M draws 45W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 40.7% difference. The GeForce GTS 160M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 160M) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
TDP
45W-34%
68W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
90°C
65°C-28%
Perf/Watt
15.1+51%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTS 160MNVS 510
MSRP
$449
Codename
GK107
GM107
Release
March 22 2012
November 4 2015
Ranking
#828
#826

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.