GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

100%

#40

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

187%

#42

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

169%

#43

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

169%

#47

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

154%

#48

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

153%

#50

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75

100%

#53

GeForce GTX 980M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

97%

#54

GeForce GTX 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

96%

#58

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

93%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

92%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile).

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+12.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 12.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile).

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+12.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 6,968 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 12.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1485 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	7,869+13%	6,968
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+12%	1485 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 87.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-20%	87
Perf/Watt	104.9	139.4+33%

💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 92.9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 12.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).