
HD Graphics P530 vs FireStream 9270

HD Graphics P530
Popular choices:

FireStream 9270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9270
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The HD Graphics P530 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The HD Graphics P530 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FireStream 9270 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics P530.
| Insight | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FireStream 9270 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P530 and FireStream 9270

HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.

FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P530 scores 1,310 and the FireStream 9270 reaches 1,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the FireStream 9270 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm+ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P530) vs 800 (FireStream 9270). Raw compute: 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,310 | 1,341+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4416 TFLOPS | 1.2 TFLOPS+172% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9270 has 2 GB. The FireStream 9270 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P530) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9270). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+19% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 5 (HD Graphics P530) vs None (FireStream 9270). Decoder: Quick Sync 5 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 (HD Graphics P530) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 5 | None |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 5 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P530 draws 15W versus the FireStream 9270's 160W — a 165.7% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P530) vs 350W (FireStream 9270). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 87.3+939% | 8.4 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P530 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FireStream 9270 launched at $1499 and now averages $20. The HD Graphics P530 costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (HD Graphics P530) vs 67.0 (FireStream 9270) — the HD Graphics P530 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 67.0 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | RV770 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | November 13 2008 |
| Ranking | #859 | #790 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















