HD Graphics P530 vs GeForce GTX 275
HD Graphics P530
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The HD Graphics P530 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The HD Graphics P530 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 275 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (896 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics P530.
| Insight | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 275 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P530 and GeForce GTX 275
HD Graphics P530
The HD Graphics P530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,310 points.
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P530 scores 1,310 and the GeForce GTX 275 reaches 1,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTX 275 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P530) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 275). Raw compute: 0.4416 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P530) vs 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,310 | 1,349+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 240+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4416 TFLOPS | 0.6739 TFLOPS+53% |
| ROPs | 3 | 28+833% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 275 has 896 MB. The GeForce GTX 275 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.875 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P530) vs 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 5 (HD Graphics P530) vs No (GeForce GTX 275). Decoder: Quick Sync 5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 (HD Graphics P530) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 5 | No |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 5 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,VP9 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P530 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 275's 219W — a 174.4% difference. The HD Graphics P530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P530) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 275). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 87.3+1308% | 6.2 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P530 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 275 launched at $249 and now averages $249. The HD Graphics P530 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (HD Graphics P530) vs 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) — the HD Graphics P530 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | HD Graphics P530 | GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 5.4 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | September 1 2015 | January 15 2009 |
| Ranking | #859 | #789 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics P530 and GeForce GTX 275
