Core i5-13600K vs Celeron 925
Core i5-13600K
Celeron 925
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 925
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2148%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Celeron 925
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Celeron 925
The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Celeron 925's 525 — a 194.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | — |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+52% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-84% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 37,655+7072% | 525 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 925 — the Core i5-13600K supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 1 (Celeron 925). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 0 (Celeron 925) — the Core i5-13600K offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+67% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs No (Celeron 925). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Celeron 925 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Celeron 925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | No |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Celeron 925 debuted at $100. At current prices ($319 vs $100), the Celeron 925 is $219 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 118.0 pts/$ vs 5.3 pts/$ for the Celeron 925 — making the Core i5-13600K the 183% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Celeron 925 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $100-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $319 | $100-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 118.0+2126% | 5.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13600K and Celeron 925
