Arc Pro B50 vs Arc A770M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

100%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

95%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

89%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

88%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

87%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

87%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

86%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

79%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

133%

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

120%

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

115%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

110%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

109%

#35

Arc A770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Arc Pro B50 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro B50 Benchmark Check

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and Arc A770M

Intel Arc Pro B50

The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 and the Arc A770M reaches 11,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the Arc A770M uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 4,096 (Arc A770M). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 32 (Arc A770M) vs 512.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
G3D Mark Score	12,208+3%	11,853
Architecture	Xe2	Generation 12.7
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048	4096+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.65 TFLOPS	16.79 TFLOPS+58%
Boost Clock	2600 MHz+27%	2050 MHz
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	128	256+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	16 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	32+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
Upscaling Tech	XeSS	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro B50 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770M has 16 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 16 MB (Arc A770M) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	16 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (Arc A770M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
Encoder	Dual Arc Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	Dual Arc Media Engine	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the Arc A770M's 120W — a 52.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 500W (Arc A770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro B50	Arc A770M
TDP	70W-42%	120W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	167mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	174.4+77%	98.8