Intel Arc Pro B50 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 120.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B50.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-120.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+120.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $349), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 39.9% better value per dollar than the Intel Arc Pro B50.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($349) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B50 and GeForce RTX 4070
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel Arc Pro B50 scores 12,208 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 120.5%. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is built on Xe2 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 184.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,208 | 26,919+121% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.65 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+174% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+5% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 46+188% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B50 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B50 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Dual Arc Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Dual Arc Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 304mm |
| Height | 69mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 174.4+30% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $349, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 36.5% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 39.7% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B50 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-42% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $349-37% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0 | 48.9+40% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | AD104 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #221 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B50 and GeForce RTX 4070
