Intel HD Graphics 620 vs GRID P40-6Q
Intel HD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
GRID P40-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-6Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel HD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel HD Graphics 620 and GRID P40-6Q
Intel HD Graphics 620
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 919+2% | 905 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+496% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel HD Graphics 620 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-6Q has 512 MB. The GRID P40-6Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+1433% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel HD Graphics 620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Intel HD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.0 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2016 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #906 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel HD Graphics 620 and GRID P40-6Q
