Intel HD Graphics 620
Quadro CX
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Quadro CX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel HD Graphics 620
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel HD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro CX is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel HD Graphics 620
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 919 | 947+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.4623 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 3 | 24+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel HD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. Quadro CX gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel HD Graphics 620 and 64-bit on the Quadro CX.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1,JPEG (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | None |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1,JPEG | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+873% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel HD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, Intel HD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($1999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel HD Graphics 620 (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.5 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | August 30 2016 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #906 | #901 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel HD Graphics 620 and Quadro CX
