Intel HD Graphics 620
Radeon HD 4850
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel HD Graphics 620
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 110W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4850
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel HD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4850 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel HD Graphics 620
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.
Radeon HD 4850
The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 919 | 946+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+160% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel HD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel HD Graphics 620 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs None (Radeon HD 4850). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1,JPEG (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4850).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | None |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1,JPEG | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W — a 152% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 95.
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-86% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 246mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C-5% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+613% | 8.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel HD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, Intel HD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel HD Graphics 620 (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 4.8 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | RV770 |
| Release | August 30 2016 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #906 | #876 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 4850
