HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel HD Graphics 620

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R5 340

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel HD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R5 340 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 340 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (935 vs 919), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 340 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel HD Graphics 620

The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.

Radeon R5 340

The Radeon R5 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the Radeon R5 340 reaches 935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R5 340 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon R5 340). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 340). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R5 340
G3D Mark Score	919	935+2%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm++	14 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+137%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1124 MHz+12%
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R5 340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel HD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 340 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 340 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel HD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 340.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R5 340
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 340's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 300W (Radeon R5 340). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R5 340
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	61.3+228%	18.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel HD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R5 340 launched at $99. On MSRP, Intel HD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 9.4 (Radeon R5 340) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 340 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R5 340
MSRP	$0-100%	$99
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	9.4
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Lexa
Release	August 30 2016	April 20 2017
Ranking	#906	#773

Search Intel HD Graphics 620 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.