HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel HD Graphics 620

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Intel HD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 240 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Intel HD Graphics 620 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (919 vs 902), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel HD Graphics 620 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R7 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel HD Graphics 620

The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 240
G3D Mark Score	919+2%	902
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	320+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	0.448 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+28%	780 MHz
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	24+20%	20

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 240
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel HD Graphics 620 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel HD Graphics 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 240
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 240
TDP	15W-50%	30W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	61.3+104%	30.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel HD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69. On MSRP, Intel HD Graphics 620 was 100+% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel HD Graphics 620 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Intel HD Graphics 620	Radeon R7 240
MSRP	$0-100%	$69
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	13.1
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Oland
Release	August 30 2016	October 8 2013
Ranking	#906	#911

Search Intel HD Graphics 620 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.