Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Intel

Intel HD Graphics 620

2016Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel HD Graphics 620

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

2018

Why buy it

  • Intel HD Graphics 620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel HD Graphics 620 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (919 vs 906), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel HD Graphics 620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Intel HD Graphics 620 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U has the stronger long-term case.

Intel HD Graphics 620 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel HD Graphics 620

The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 906 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel HD Graphics 620 scores 919 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 384 (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureIntel HD Graphics 620Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
G3D Mark Score
919+1%
906
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Vega
Process Node
14 nm++
14 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+240%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1100 MHz+10%
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel HD Graphics 620Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel HD Graphics 620 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureIntel HD Graphics 620Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel HD Graphics 620 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel HD Graphics 620Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
61.3+1%
60.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel HD Graphics 620 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureIntel HD Graphics 620Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
August 30 2016
January 7 2018
Ranking
#906
#831

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.