Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon R4

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon R4

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon R4 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon R4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon R4

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 605 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R4 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.2% in PassMark G3D (364 vs 346), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R4 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R4 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 605 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Radeon R4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 605

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.

AMD

Radeon R4

The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 scores 364 versus the Radeon R4's 346 — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 leads by 5.2%. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R4 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 384 (Radeon R4). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon R4
G3D Mark Score
364+5%
346
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
14 nm
Shading Units
184
384+109%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
0.9085 TFLOPS+115%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+2%
1124 MHz
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
23
24+4%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon R4
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R4 carries 512 MB. Radeon R4 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 605 and 64-bit on the Radeon R4.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon R4
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 605 draws 15W versus the Radeon R4's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 350W (Radeon R4). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon R4
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
24.3+252%
6.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 came in at $0, while the Radeon R4 launched at $100. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 605 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) vs 3.5 (Radeon R4) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 605Radeon R4
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
3.5
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
Lexa
Release
October 1 2017
April 20 2017
Ranking
#824
#773

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.