Intel UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon 625
Intel UHD Graphics 710
Popular choices:
Radeon 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 710.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 625 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 710 and Radeon 625
Intel UHD Graphics 710
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 scores 1,052 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.3328 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,052 | 1,077+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.3328 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+136% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+27% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 625 has 512 MB. The Radeon 625 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 draws 15W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1+226% | 21.5 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 710 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon 625 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 21.5 (Radeon 625) — the Intel UHD Graphics 710 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 21.5 |
| Codename | Alder Lake GT1 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #855 | #858 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 710 and Radeon 625
