UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon R7 250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 710

2022

Why buy it

✅Radeon R7 250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Intel UHD Graphics 710 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2022 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Intel UHD Graphics 710 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,052 vs 1,051), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Intel UHD Graphics 710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Intel UHD Graphics 710 has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 710 vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 710

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 scores 1,052 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 0.3328 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	1,052	1,051
Architecture	Generation 12.2	GCN 1.0
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	384+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.3328 TFLOPS	0.8064 TFLOPS+142%
Boost Clock	1300 MHz+24%	1050 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	8	24+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 710 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 125% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Radeon R7 250
TDP	15W-77%	65W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	70.1+333%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 710 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 710 was 100+% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the Intel UHD Graphics 710 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 710 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	Radeon R7 250
MSRP	$0-100%	$89
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	11.8
Codename	Alder Lake GT1	Oland
Release	January 4 2022	October 8 2013
Ranking	#855	#871

Search Intel UHD Graphics 710 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.