UHD Graphics 710 vs RadeonT 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 710.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 710	RadeonT 610M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 710 Benchmark Check

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 710 and RadeonT 610M

Intel UHD Graphics 710

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 scores 1,052 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 is built on Generation 12.2 while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 128 (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.3328 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,052	1,068+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	128	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.3328 TFLOPS	0.5632 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock	1300 MHz	2200 MHz+69%
ROPs	8+100%	4
TMUs	8	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M has 512 MB. The RadeonT 610M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 710	RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 draws 15W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 0% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 710) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.