
Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Intel UHD Graphics 770
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 770.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics MAX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Intel UHD Graphics 770
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 27 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,914 points.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 scores 1,914 and the Iris Xe Graphics MAX reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,914 | 1,972+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 768+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 draws 15W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 50% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.6+62% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) — the Intel UHD Graphics 770 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $55 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 49.3 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake GT1 | DG1 |
| Release | September 27 2022 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #644 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












