Intel UHD Graphics 770
VS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 770

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
96%
#129
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
303%
#131
275%
#132
274%
#136
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
249%
#137
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
247%
#139
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
97%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

InsightIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) (10nm)
Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 770

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 27 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,914 points.

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 scores 1,914 and the Iris Xe MAX Graphics reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on a 10 nm process. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1650 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,914
1,972+3%
Architecture
Generation 12.2
Generation 12.1
Process Node
10 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
256
768+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS+200%
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1650 MHz
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
16
48+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 draws 15W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W — a 50% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
TDP
15W-40%
25W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
127.6+62%
78.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 and now averages $40. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Intel UHD Graphics 770 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP
$0-100%
$55
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$40
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
49.3
Codename
Raptor Lake GT1
DG1
Release
September 27 2022
October 31 2020
Ranking
#644
#686