Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro M520

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 770

2022Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M520

2017Core: 1041 MHzBoost: 1019 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro M520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro M520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 770

2022

Why buy it

  • Quadro M520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2022 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,914 vs 1,913), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel UHD Graphics 770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Intel UHD Graphics 770 has the stronger long-term case.

Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro M520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 770

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 27 2022. It features the Generation 12.2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,914 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 scores 1,914 and the Quadro M520 reaches 1,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is built on Generation 12.2 while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1019 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Quadro M520
G3D Mark Score
1,914
1,913
Architecture
Generation 12.2
Maxwell
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8448 TFLOPS+6%
0.7995 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+62%
1019 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Quadro M520
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 carries 2 GB. Quadro M520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and 64-bit on the Quadro M520.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Quadro M520
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 draws 15W versus the Quadro M520's 25W — a 50% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Quadro M520
TDP
15W-40%
25W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
127.6+67%
76.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 came in at $0, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 770 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 770) vs 9.6 (Quadro M520) — the Intel UHD Graphics 770 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 770 (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 770Quadro M520
MSRP
$0-100%
$200
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.6
Codename
Raptor Lake GT1
GM108
Release
September 27 2022
January 11 2017
Ranking
#644
#695

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.