
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:

Quadro P500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $500 for the Quadro P500, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 403% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+403%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and Quadro P500

Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.

Quadro P500
The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 1,669 and the Quadro P500 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro P500 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 256 (Quadro P500). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 0.7772 TFLOPS (Quadro P500). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 1518 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,669 | 1,659 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 0.7772 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1518 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+300% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P500 has 4 GB. The Quadro P500 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 draws 15W versus the Quadro P500's 18W — a 18.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 350W (Quadro P500). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-17% | 18W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 111.3+21% | 92.2 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro P500 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 costs 80% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 3.3 (Quadro P500) — the Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers 406.1% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Quadro P500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-70% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-80% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7+406% | 3.3 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP108 |
| Release | 2021 | January 5 2018 |
| Ranking | #717 | #740 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













