GRID M10-2B vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank #372 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-2B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M10-2B offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M10-2B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $100 for the Intel UHD Graphics P750, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 23.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and Intel UHD Graphics P750
GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,644 | 1,669+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 2048+700% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+625% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1300 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 0 MB. The GRID M10-2B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 175% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3 | 111.3+1425% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The GRID M10-2B costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) vs 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) — the GRID M10-2B offers 23.4% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $150-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-20% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6+23% | 16.7 |
| Codename | GM204 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #433 | #717 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-2B and Intel UHD Graphics P750
