GRID M10-2B
VS
Quadro P500

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P500

GRID M10-2B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P500

2018Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1518 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank 372 and the Quadro P500 is on rank 244, so the Quadro P500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B

#357
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
22383%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
100%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
98%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
92%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
92%
#376
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
92%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
91%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
88%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
85%
#380
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
85%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
80%
#382
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
80%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
71%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
67%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
65%
#386
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
65%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P500

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
96%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
89%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
87%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
86%
#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
80%
#229
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4450%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
95%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
95%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
88%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
86%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
85%
#254
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
82%
#255
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
82%
#256
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
82%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
80%
#258
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P500 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-2B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2B.

InsightGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M10-2B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $500 for the Quadro P500, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 519.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+519.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and Quadro P500

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P500

The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro P500 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P500 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 256 (Quadro P500). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.7772 TFLOPS (Quadro P500). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1518 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
G3D Mark Score
1,644
1,659
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+700%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+521%
0.7772 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1518 MHz+29%
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+700%
16
L1 Cache
768 KB+700%
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P500 has 4 GB. The Quadro P500 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P500) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro P500's 18W — a 170.4% difference. The Quadro P500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro P500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
TDP
225W
18W-92%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
7.3
92.2+1163%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Quadro P500 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The GRID M10-2B costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) vs 3.3 (Quadro P500) — the GRID M10-2B offers 524.2% better value. The Quadro P500 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M10-2BQuadro P500
MSRP
$2500
$500-80%
Avg Price (30d)
$80-84%
$500
Performance per Dollar
20.6+524%
3.3
Codename
GM204
GP108
Release
August 30 2015
January 5 2018
Ranking
#433
#740