
FirePro W600

GRID M10-2B
FirePro W600 vs GRID M10-2B Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W600 vs GRID M10-2B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W600 vs GRID M10-2B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W600
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 330.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M10-2B
2015Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β317.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W600 vs GRID M10-2B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695+3% | 1,644 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+528% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W600 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2B carries 512 MB. FirePro W600 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W600 and 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro W600) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) β the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W β a 100% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown | β |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6+210% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W600 came in at $599, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro W600 was 76% cheaper ($1901 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (FirePro W600) vs 0.7 (GRID M10-2B) β the FirePro W600 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is GRID M10-2B (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-76% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8+300% | 0.7 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GM204 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #732 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















